-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kevin Horton wrote: | | I don't know what to call the new tree - I originally thought that | "testing" could work, but after looking at the way Debian does things I | think this would simply cause confusion. How about "kamikaze"? That | would certainly push the idea that people should only enable this new | tree if they were prepared for things to break.
I agree with you. Well, almost :). We need a way to validate package submissions, and build them automatically. If the validation and building go ~ okay then they go into this new tree. From the new tree they can be automatically moved to unstable after, say 3 weeks. The move to unstable could be stopped by committer if someone deems it necessary, but the idea should be that things make the unstable tree unless someone stops it. I also don't agree with the kamikaze name, Japanese users would likely use such a tree in preference to stable. Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBQsakIbiDAg3OZTLPAQKMOwP7Bmi2v2tNb8rsZUQIGjMz1Uzhr+7ncrDl PGfGwNr9Z+BG7Wv3C6c3Fhui0RK5WzKc2sdrMC1XDKZrJ9dG9JuF8gU4/wW+SP3R l7JXA+tal4hRYgQba1NYFWu7addfVQK2ZQxePuoy8Qlr/ERGzMvsUaYmTzNA1BUh 1pAxYZOW4A0= =1lLc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
