Le 3 juil. 2005 à 00:22, Nigel Stanger a écrit :
On 3/7/2005 9:05 AM, Michèle Garoche at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
thus:
3 - A package foo at version x compiles, but it is desirable that the
same package foo exists also at version x-1, because otherwise other
packages would not compile
This is, for example, the case for doxygen at the moment, where the
version in unstable is fine, except for kde, which requires a lower
version which is in stable, so that it would not be desirable to put
automatically the version in unstable in the stable tree after yy
days. At least till a version of kde could cope with the version of
doxygen in unstable.
But the automatic move isn't from unstable to stable --- that will
remain a
manual process (as it should).
I did not mean that this should change.
I only answered Matthew's last question.
Anyway, the reasons why a move from a place to another place cannot/
should not/may not occur do not change fundamentally whichever trees
are involved and do not let them easily categorised from a machine
point of view.
I would think that this case (and probably the other two cases as
well)
falls into Matthew's category of "has a critical bug filed against
it",
which would prevent any automatic move of that package.
The gtk-doc case is not what I would call a bug, it can easily be
tested automatically, and eventually a --disable-gtk-doc could be
added automatically to the package if it fails to compile.
Cheers,
Michèle
<http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
