Alexander,
   When one has two packages,

foobar.info
foobar-10.4.info

where foobar.info has...

Version: 1.0
Revision: 1.0
Distribution: 10.5, 10.6

and foobar-10.4.info has...

Version: 1.0
Revision: 1.0
Distribution: 10.4

I thought the foobar-10.4.info is ignored by fink 
unless the Revision is higher than the stock package
for foobar.info. This can be seen by comparing the
Revisions in gauche-10.4.info, gauche-10.5.info and
gauche-10.6.info in the languages subdirectory. Their
revisions (for the same version) are 1, 1001 and 2001
specifically. In the case of a variant that has a
version *lower* than the main package file a revision
is insufficient and an epoch must be used.
                Jack
ps I wouldn't add the epoch to unzip-10.4.info though
since I'm sure my proposed changes to unzip-10.4.info
I will build (after bumping the revision to 100).

On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:35:32AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Jack Howarth wrote:
> > Robert,
> >    Try changing...
> >
> > Revision: 1
> >
> > ...to...
> >
> > Revision: 100
> >
> > I thought that the variants had to either be of the
> > same version but a greater revision or have an epoch
> > if the version in the variant was smaller than the
> > main package file. So the current unzip-10.4.info
> > should have been epoched, while the packaging I proposed
> > just needs a Revision: 100 (unless someone jumps in 
> > and epochs the current unzip-10.4 before we update it).
> >                   Jack
> >
> >
> >   
> It wasn't epoched because it didn't build. If we were forcing a
> downgrade of an installed version, an Epoch is appropriate, but we're not.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to