Benjamin Reed wrote: []
OK, it's a little clearer now. But why the -dev package at all? The new qt3 package does not contain any files (OK, one file, of length zero, and a couple of directories). Why not put the headers back in there?Well, originally I had put those packages together assuming that they would be released before qt 3.1 packages got released. That would have made it all OK, because at the time, for compatibility purposes, qt3 depended on qt3-dev in the new packages, so it would have continued to work. Then it was pointed out that you're not supposed to depend on -dev packages so I removed it (which in this case, I don't agree with, but what the hey). =)
--
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
