Enrico Franconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another possibility could be to package the TeXLive distribution itself, but > I have no idea of how much more effort it should be put on it wrt tetex. > I got the following message: > > On 16/02/2003 18:04, JF Mertens wrote: > > (Shouldn't be that hard _ at least as for what concerns the build itself, it > > is basically the same as for tetex, and you should be able to reuse most of > > the settings and ConfigParams of the tetex package). But probably best to use > > the TeXlive sources (the texmf tree) then also a number of those additional > > commands rely on it, and anyway the TeXlive sources are a much richer > > selection. >
I'm willing to look into this, but catching up to the new release of teTeX took a big chunck of my time in the past few weeks, and I'm not going to get to it very soon. Please submit a request for TeXLive to the package request tracker, and we'll assign it to me so that it goes on my to-do list. -- Dave > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
