On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:50:00PM -0600, Chupacerveza wrote: > Walt Mankowski wrote: > > > > 3. For the wxgtk2.8 modules, I had to first 'fink remove' them, and > > then 'fink rebuild' them. After that the builds completed with > > error. > > Glad that worked Walt. For what it's worth, these problems don't happen > with a "clean" fink installation on Snow Leopard. I'm not suggesting > that there's anything wrong with trying to upgrade fink in place from > Leopard to Snow Leopard because many people have it done it, but it > might be a lot less heartache to remove it and start fresh in some cases. > > Then again, if we could determine all the trouble spots, it might be > possible to make a list of which packages should be rebuilt when > upgrading. From a support perspective it is most efficient to simply > recommend clean installs, but since there are already instructions about > how to upgrade, maybe we could modify them to include a running list of > need-to-be-rebuilt packages. I'm just thinking out loud here.
This build failure was due to a pretty blatant bug in wxgtk2.8's makefiles: passing global -L flags (for dependent libs, etc.) early in the linker call and then using -l to find a "currently being built" lib. By having the local -L after the global one, they are guaranteeing that a previously-installed wxgtk2.8 will always contaminate a new build and only by luck will it actually link and/or run as expected. Ever. On any playform. dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users