On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:54:52 -0700, Alexander Hansen 
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/24/12 4:45 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> > Alex, in the 10.4 tree there are still lots of packages having this
> > fatal bdep combination, half a dozen in the kde directory, for example. 
> > > I have a stupid question: Does automake1.11-core really have to depend
> > on autoconf, and why?
>
> The prior monolithic automake1.11 had a Depends: autoconf (>= 1:2.63-1)
> | autoconf2.6 , so there's a precedent, at least:
>
> http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/devel/automake1.11.info?revision=1.7&view=markup
>
> I don't know why the dependency was changed only to allow autoconf2.6 . 

Max's original plans included also converting autoconf to a set of 
*-core concurrently-installable packages, so adjusting automake*-core 
to use them directly would solve it (using one specific ac would not 
force out the other ac's). Not sure the status of that project though. 
See "Re: [fink-core] automake changes" on 10/14 for my general whine 
about the current deadlocky situation. 

dan

  --
Daniel Macks
[email protected]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to