Proprietors don't usually post notices prohibiting weapons to be brought onto the property because they are pacifistic. They mainly do it because they are advised by lawyers that they risk being successfully sued if someone uses a weapon unlawfully on the property and they didn't cover themselves by posting the notice. Actually, the bulk of precedent in most states is against the proprietor being held responsible for illegal acts of persons on the property, unless there is evidence the illegal act was pursuant to the policy of the proprietor. That creates an area of legal ambiguity that affords plaintiff lawyers an opening.

What is needed is clear precedent or legislation that holds proprietors harmless for illegal acts of persons on their property for lack of a policy prohibiting weapons, but which holds them liable for protecting visitors if they disarm themselves under the terms of the notice and are thereby deprived of the ability to defend themselves or others. That would put the burden of responsibility where it belongs. One can expect that if this were established, legal counsel to proprietors would advise them that the risks are greater from prohibiting weapons than from not doing so.

-- Jon

----------------------------------------------------------------
Our efforts depend on donations from people like you. Directions
for donors are at     http://www.constitution.org/whatucando.htm
Constitution Society      7793 Burnet Road #37, Austin, TX 78757
512/374-9585   www.constitution.org  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get your free digital certificate from http://www.thawte.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to