Greg, 
 
Can't you read e-mail properly?  You've got it ALL wrong.  If you can't be 
careful, don't say anything.
 
One has to be careful in copying things into replies/forwards.  CONTRARY TO 
APPEARANCES OF THIS E-MAIL, I DID NOT "write" THE QUOTED LANGUAGE.  Anyone who 
has been reading my postings on FIREARMSREGPROF for the past 10 years, would 
certainly suspect, if not KNOW, that to be the case!
 
LET ME REPEAT THAT -- I DID NOT "write" THE QUOTED WORDS.
             MAXINE BURKETT ( 
http://hq.ssrn.com/Journals/RedirectClick.cfm?url=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=691827&partid=47512&did=24820&eid=35845063
 ) WROTE THAT STATEMENT.
 
It was in an article, written by MAXINE BURKETT ( 
http://hq.ssrn.com/Journals/RedirectClick.cfm?url=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=691827&partid=47512&did=24820&eid=35845063
 ), who quite erroneously, IMHO, thinks that racism has something to do with 
the Second Amendment.  She is another Carl Bogus in her views.  In my post, it 
is easy to identify the real author rather than the commentator.  In your 
reply/forward, the commentator (me) is made to appear to be the author of the 
views.  This is a quirk in e-mail software but one that the sender of the 
response CAN prevent by foresight and action.
 
It's nice that you "don't accept Professor's Olson's overall hypothesis," 
because you've got it all f**ked up!  Go read MAXINE BURKETT ( 
http://hq.ssrn.com/Journals/RedirectClick.cfm?url=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=691827&partid=47512&did=24820&eid=35845063
 )'s article which I cited (not accepted, praised, or validated) and see what 
SHE says.  HER VIEWS, not mine.
 
I know how this sort of thing starts out and that it has to be stopped at once. 
 I've been the victim before of this process whereby a poster is turned into an 
author through someone else's sloppy e-mail reply or forward.  I'm still trying 
to kill off a recurrent e-mail FROM the year 2000 in which I am made to look 
like the author of certain "controversial" statements.  Statements that I never 
made.
 
 
Professor Joseph Olson, J.D., LL.M.                        o-  651-523-2142  
Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)         f-   651-523-2236
St. Paul, MN  55113-1235                                      c-  612-865-7956
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                               
 
>>> Greg Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/27/08 3:42 PM >> ( mailto:[EMAIL 
>>> PROTECTED]> )

Prof. Olson writes:

"The reason is simple: The persistent and always tense debate over gun rights 
has thinly veiled underlying racial and socio-political struggles that are as 
old as the Union itself. "


I might be opening a can of worms but here goes.....
***   And I simply cannot accept Professor Olson's overall hypothesis. 
Of course not, it is NOT Olson's hypothesis to begin with!
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to