The first clause recognizes that, if Congress so chooses, "none" is not the right answer.
"I then questioned the suspect as to his ownership of firearms. He confessed to owning none. At that point, he was taken into custody and Mirandized. Further questioning determined that he also did not own ammunition or a bayonet."
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Lee
Sent: Aug 16, 2012 9:24 PM
To: "Joseph E. Olson", List Firearms Reg
Subject: Re: Background intelligence "The First Amendment, for example, guarantees both the right to speak and the right not to speak."Try to "not speak" if you are a reporter trying to protect the ID of a source after ordered revealed by a judge.Phil
From: Joseph E. Olson <[email protected]>
To: List Firearms Reg <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:54 PM
Subject: Background intelligence
I've just learned that I'll be on a panel with him at the Univ. of Wisconsin in early November. Anyone know him or his work?****************************************************************************************************************Professor Joseph Olson, J.D., LL.M. o- 651-523-2142
Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037) f- 651-523-2236
St. Paul, MN 55113-1235 c- 612-865-7956
[email protected] http://law.hamline.edu/constitutional_law/joseph_olson.html+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Associate Professor Joseph Blocher’s principal academic interests include federal and state constitutional law, the First and Second Amendments, capital punishment, and property.He joined the Duke Law faculty in 2009. Before coming to Duke, he clerked for Guido Calabresi of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Rosemary Barkett of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. He also practiced in the appellate group of O’Melveny & Myers, where he assisted the merits briefing for the District of Columbia in District of Columbia v. Heller.Articles:The Right Not to Keep or Bear Arms, 64 Stanford Law Review 1-54 (2012)Categoricalism and Balancing in First and Second Amendment Analysis, 84 New York University Law Review 375-434 (2009)Heller's Problematic Second Amendment Categoricalism, The Legal Workshop (October 2, 2009)
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
