I'm unaware that the Constitution has more than one use of "militia" which 
seems to be those people who may be called to defend the republic.  Congress, 
not the Constitution, provides for qualifications of who is subject to the 
call, but the exclusions of some cannot denigrate their rights as a part of the 
whole undefined militia (even Quakers hunt with firearms) since the right to 
arms is a right of the people, not militia members.

For this discussion, I don't see a reason to divide the militia into categories.

Phil



________________________________
 From: Jon Roland <[email protected]>
To: Phil Lee <[email protected]> 
Cc: Joseph Blocher <[email protected]>; firearmsregprof 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: Background intelligence
 

It is important to distinguish between militia as defense activity, and those 
who engage in it, from the mandatory or obligatory militia who may be legally 
required to muster for organizing and training, which excludes the unfit, the 
young, the old, most women, foreign visitors, and certain public officials. 
However, the concept of militia is that in an emergency all persons, with no 
exceptions, may be legally required to respond within his or her means. The law 
cannot require the impossible, and for some a firearm may be unaffordable, but 
in  pinch fists and clubs can suffice. 

In the Founding Era gunsmithing was a local cottage industry and
    many persons made their own. Some still do, as firearms are a simple
    technology that requires only a few handtools and readily available
    materials to make. The tough components are springs and primers.

One of the centers of gun-manufacturing is the town of Darra Adam
    Khel, near Peshawar, Pakistan, which was historically known for
    manufacturing the Lee Enfield .303; however, the town now produces
    ordnance including the AK-47, the mini-Kalashnikov, and hand-held
    firearms, including the James Bond pen gun. They mostly use simple
    non-power tools.

On 08/21/2012 12:33 PM, Phil Lee wrote: 
The right to not keep or bear arms exists for some, since not all persons are 
in the militia.


-- Jon ----------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society               http://constitution.org
2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322 twitter.com/lex_rex Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001 
[email protected] 
----------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to