On 9/26/03 1:23 PM, "Paul Barnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, a change was made late in the process that reduced the
> preemption to a "defense to prosecution", which means a CHL holder can
> still be arrested and charged for an offense. I expect at least one
> city to take advantage of this loophole, but I haven't heard of any
> specific incidents.
You mean that a person charged under a municipal ordinance has the
affirmative defense that the ordinance is unlawful under state law? That
seems awfully strange.
--
Bob Woolley
St. Paul, MN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well
please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take
the consequences.
--P.J. O'Rourke
