My sentiments exactly. I suggested for simplicity and security they use
raptor (since they have it). But, they are weighing the monetary aspect
(although, I argue the security aspect versus the money).
As far as I know, there isn't any inherent problems with Raptor and VPN? Am
I correct?
eric.
-----Original Message-----
From: J Weismann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 3:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: W2k, Raptor...VPN?
Eric,
I assume they just want a straight Win2k VPN, no firewall protection and
just a connection inward. Do they not want any security for the computers
on the inside? Win2k(To my knowledge) doesn't have any inheret protection
built in like Raptor does. My advice:
If you want your computers running at 8AM when you come back to work the
next day...use Raptor. Else...I hope you have a nice copy of Norton ghost
and Backup Exec!
"Layer 4 and up is for End Users"
-Anonymous CCNA
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
