It's possible that someone would know that something is illegal
without being able to cite the exact statute.







> The presumption that there are protections without a specific reference to
> such a protection seems to me to be ill-founded.  My own meager research
> finds only a 500m "safety zone" for undersea installations and protecton
> of undersea cables in _territorial_ waters to be codified in international
> law.  Saying "They're protected" seems to me to be the same as taking a
> vendor's word that a product is a "great firewall" without any supporting
> evidence it's not necessarily the most prudent course of action.
>
> Paul
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal
opinions
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
>
PSB#9280
>
>
>

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to