Title: RE: Migration from Gauntlet 5 to Firewall-1

If they hide they don't do it well...
http://www.securecomputing.com/index.cfm?skey=979
-gab

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Migration from Gauntlet 5 to Firewall-1



Paul's right.  Secure Computing bought Gauntlet.  I received that info from
a Secure Computing Employee.  Don't think it's a secret though.  Not sure
what their going to do with it...

Kevin

--__--__--

Message: 9
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 18:15:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Paul Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: kk downing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Migration from Gauntlet 5 to Firewall-1

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, kk downing wrote:

> I would be curious to hear what folks out there have
> to say about who the good Proxy Firewall vendors are
> right now? Who has the market share? The only
> commercial one I can readily name is Gauntlet.

NAI sold Guantlet to someone (I think it was Secure Computing.)

Raptor and Sidewinder are the two big ones that spring immediately to
mind, but I'm sure there are lots more given the number of commercial
firewall products out there now, you might want to get a copy of
the ICSA Labs 2001 Firewall Buyers Guide[1], which is downloadable
(registration required) from:

http://www.icsalabs.com/html/communities/firewalls/index.shtml

The link is near the bottom of the page.  Guantlet still probably has
market share for proxy-based firewalls.

Paul
[1] Disclaimer:  TruSecure pays me, we own ICSA Labs therefore I've a
vested
interest in promoting the info.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."


_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls

Reply via email to