We deman an answer! At 02:19 PM 4/18/2002 -0500, Noonan, Wesley wrote: >The of course you have this: > >http://news.theolympian.com/stories/20020304/Business/28667.shtml > > >Wes Noonan, MCSE/MCT/CCNA/CCDA/NNCSS >Senior QA Rep. >BMC Software, Inc. >(713) 918-2412 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.bmc.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brian Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 12:11 > > To: Chris Kirschke > > Cc: Clifford Thurber; Noonan Wesley; Mikael Olsson; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Digital Legends (was: RE: Microsoft ISA server (Was: Re: > > Replacingmy old PIX Classic)) > > > > Chris, > > > > Gee whiz. Maybe I missed it. Where does it say that QNX is used in > > IOS? Or PIX? > > > > It's not. > > > > Liberty for All, > > > > Brian > > > > At 10:01 AM 4/18/2002 -0700, Chris Kirschke wrote: > > >http://www.qnx.com/news/pr/may18_98-cisco.html > > > > > >Chris Kirschke > > >Lead Engineer > > >Astreya Partners, Inc > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >408-790-5900 xt 531 > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Clifford Thurber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:36 AM > > >To: Brian Ford; Noonan Wesley; 'Mikael Olsson' > > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Re: Digital Legends (was: RE: Microsoft ISA server (Was: Re: > > >Replacingmy old PIX Classic)) > > > > > > > > >I don't have the link in front of me but I saw a news blurb that Cisco > > >licensced QNX in 1998? > > > > > > > > > > > >At 12:27 PM 4/18/2002 -0400, Brian Ford wrote: > > > >Wes, > > > > > > > >I don't know where you heard this legend about IOS running on some > > other > > > >OS.... It is not true. > > > > > > > >IOS is an operating system implemented directly on a hardware > > > >platform. There is no underlying operating system. Look at your IOS > > > >router for a "Boot Loader"; that's a small IOS kernel (and not a third > > > >party OS). > > > > > > > >PIX OS ran many, many, many years ago on top of a real time OS > > (Finesse) > > > >that was developed specifically for the hardware platform that the PIX > > > >used at that time. Today, the PIX OS runs directly on hardware (when > > you > > > >look at the actual PIX source code you sometimes see references to the > > old > > > >real time OS). > > > > > > > >You may be thinking of one of a number attempts (by third parties) to > > > >create a program that runs on Unix that can execute an IOS or PIX > > > >image. The latest attempt at something like that was the "IOU" (IOS On > > > >Unix) project. I don't know how far that ever got. > > > > > > > >This claim that either IOS or PIX is a version of Unix or running on > > Unix > > > >is becoming a kind of annual event. Maybe someone will claim that all > > > >Linux implementations actually runs on one copy of run-time Windows NT > > > >v4.0 next? > > > > > > > >Liberty for All, > > > > > > > >Brian > > > > > > > >At 08:15 AM 4/18/2002 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >>Message: 6 > > > >>From: "Noonan, Wesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>To: "'Clifford Thurber'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > > >> "'Mikael Olsson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>Subject: RE: Microsoft ISA server (Was: Re: Replacing my old PIX > > Classic) > > > >>Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 09:12:38 -0500 > > > >> > > > >>A sizable chuck of Cisco (don't know for sure on the PIX, but I know > > on > > > >>their routers) runs an OS behind the scenes that is called Xenix, XNS, > > ZNS, > > > >>or something along those lines (I really don't recall the actual > > name). IOS > > > >>runs on top of that (is my understanding, kind of like how Banyan ran > > > on top > > > >>of Unix). My point was simply, if one is going to cast the "a firewall > > is > > > >>only as strong as the underlying OS" stone, they need to be prepared > > to > > > cast > > > >>that stone at virtually every firewall out there. It is hardly a ISA > > > >>specific issue (heck, FW1 runs on MS doesn't it?). > > > >> > > > >>Wes Noonan > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>281-208-8993 > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Firewalls mailing list > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls >_______________________________________________ >Firewalls mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
_______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
