Just because we may license one product or another does not, ipso facto, mean that it is part of the PIX OS or IOS. Those are completely proprietary operating systems. I mean, look at our product list. We literally sell thousands of products. Many are not IOS or PIX OS based.
I'd suggest some of you have read one too many conspiracy theories, but given the nature of this group (myself included), that would just be a PGIO (Piercing Glance Into the Obvious.) ;-) -bill At 03:37 PM 4/18/2002 -0400, Clifford Thurber wrote: >We deman an answer! > >At 02:19 PM 4/18/2002 -0500, Noonan, Wesley wrote: >>The of course you have this: >> >>http://news.theolympian.com/stories/20020304/Business/28667.shtml >> >> >>Wes Noonan, MCSE/MCT/CCNA/CCDA/NNCSS >>Senior QA Rep. >>BMC Software, Inc. >>(713) 918-2412 >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://www.bmc.com >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Brian Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 12:11 >> > To: Chris Kirschke >> > Cc: Clifford Thurber; Noonan Wesley; Mikael Olsson; >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Subject: RE: Digital Legends (was: RE: Microsoft ISA server (Was: Re: >> > Replacingmy old PIX Classic)) >> > >> > Chris, >> > >> > Gee whiz. Maybe I missed it. Where does it say that QNX is used in >> > IOS? Or PIX? >> > >> > It's not. >> > >> > Liberty for All, >> > >> > Brian >> > >> > At 10:01 AM 4/18/2002 -0700, Chris Kirschke wrote: >> > >http://www.qnx.com/news/pr/may18_98-cisco.html >> > > >> > >Chris Kirschke >> > >Lead Engineer >> > >Astreya Partners, Inc >> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >408-790-5900 xt 531 >> > > >> > > >> > >-----Original Message----- >> > >From: Clifford Thurber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > >Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:36 AM >> > >To: Brian Ford; Noonan Wesley; 'Mikael Olsson' >> > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >Subject: Re: Digital Legends (was: RE: Microsoft ISA server (Was: Re: >> > >Replacingmy old PIX Classic)) >> > > >> > > >> > >I don't have the link in front of me but I saw a news blurb that Cisco >> > >licensced QNX in 1998? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >At 12:27 PM 4/18/2002 -0400, Brian Ford wrote: >> > > >Wes, >> > > > >> > > >I don't know where you heard this legend about IOS running on some >> > other >> > > >OS.... It is not true. >> > > > >> > > >IOS is an operating system implemented directly on a hardware >> > > >platform. There is no underlying operating system. Look at your IOS >> > > >router for a "Boot Loader"; that's a small IOS kernel (and not a third >> > > >party OS). >> > > > >> > > >PIX OS ran many, many, many years ago on top of a real time OS >> > (Finesse) >> > > >that was developed specifically for the hardware platform that the PIX >> > > >used at that time. Today, the PIX OS runs directly on hardware (when >> > you >> > > >look at the actual PIX source code you sometimes see references to the >> > old >> > > >real time OS). >> > > > >> > > >You may be thinking of one of a number attempts (by third parties) to >> > > >create a program that runs on Unix that can execute an IOS or PIX >> > > >image. The latest attempt at something like that was the "IOU" (IOS On >> > > >Unix) project. I don't know how far that ever got. >> > > > >> > > >This claim that either IOS or PIX is a version of Unix or running on >> > Unix >> > > >is becoming a kind of annual event. Maybe someone will claim that all >> > > >Linux implementations actually runs on one copy of run-time Windows NT >> > > >v4.0 next? >> > > > >> > > >Liberty for All, >> > > > >> > > >Brian >> > > > >> > > >At 08:15 AM 4/18/2002 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > > >>Message: 6 >> > > >>From: "Noonan, Wesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > >>To: "'Clifford Thurber'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> > > >> "'Mikael Olsson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > >>Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > >>Subject: RE: Microsoft ISA server (Was: Re: Replacing my old PIX >> > Classic) >> > > >>Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 09:12:38 -0500 >> > > >> >> > > >>A sizable chuck of Cisco (don't know for sure on the PIX, but I know >> > on >> > > >>their routers) runs an OS behind the scenes that is called Xenix, XNS, >> > ZNS, >> > > >>or something along those lines (I really don't recall the actual >> > name). IOS >> > > >>runs on top of that (is my understanding, kind of like how Banyan ran >> > > on top >> > > >>of Unix). My point was simply, if one is going to cast the "a firewall >> > is >> > > >>only as strong as the underlying OS" stone, they need to be prepared >> > to >> > > cast >> > > >>that stone at virtually every firewall out there. It is hardly a ISA >> > > >>specific issue (heck, FW1 runs on MS doesn't it?). >> > > >> >> > > >>Wes Noonan >> > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >>281-208-8993 >> > > > >> > > >> > >_______________________________________________ >> > >Firewalls mailing list >> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls >>_______________________________________________ >>Firewalls mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls > >_______________________________________________ >Firewalls mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls ______________________________________________________________________________________ Bill McGee, CCNA Cisco Systems, Inc. VPN and Security Business Unit Global Channels Manager Security Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 801.319.5584 Pager: 800.365.4578 Make your Cisco network "SAFE" http://www.cisco.com/go/safe/ ______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
