On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 19:52, Laird Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > Oops, I might have been unclear there. You might have misinterpreted > me, although I can see how you might have come to that misinterpretation > - I wasn't very careful with my wording. I didn't mean to imply that I > would donate the money myself, I was just asking whether they would > accept an "anonymous" donation at all. Sorry for any confusion.
If (as I understand it) nobody can contact the current site's admin, wouldn't it be better to scrape the content, let it expire, and get new hosting which people who are active/interested have the passwords for? Seems to me like anonymous donations just delay problems rather than solve them. -- Rob Farmer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
