On 13/10/10 16:18, Terin Stock wrote: > Our best bet of keeping that domain is exhausting ways of contacting them.
I'm not sure what you mean by this - can you explain? > I had to sound like "me, me, me and me", but I am mirroring the static > content on the .com. As I am my own provider, I'm more than happy to > support the community, and setup whatever we need. The downside? Unless > we can get someone that can edit the page (or point the DNS at us), we > lose the inbound links. > > Sorry if I jumped the gun in renewing the .org domain registration. :( There probably wasn't enough discussion of the problem and of potential solutions before action was taken, but your point about domain squatters potentially getting there first is a good one. I don't know what the solution to that risk is. I'm not really active in the fish community these days so I won't make any suggestions, but this issue/problem could probably do with a bit more discussion amongst you active members (I hope that isn't redundant and that it doesn't come across as presumptuous). Laird ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
