On 02/01/2011 09:37 AM, w1hkj wrote:
W6HGF wrote:


On 02/01/2011 06:52 AM, Ed wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:50:49 -0600 (CST)
Jim Haynes<[email protected]>  wrote:

If this is already spelled out somewhere I'll plead guilty to being
lazy.

I just jumped through a bunch of hoops to get signed up with LOTW, and
have uploaded logs from fldigi on both Windows and Linux.  Now I don't
know what to do about future QSOs.  Is there a way to mark the log in
Linux with what I have already sent to LOTW so I don't extract it and
send it again?  Or is it OK to keep sending in cumulative logs and
they get rid of the duplicates?  Or am I asking the wrong question?

There is no way that I know of to mark the logs. LoTW does not get rid
of dupes and I'm not sure there is a way a user can. You can submit
logs say on a monthly or weekly schedule. Then just rename the fldigi
log so you know where you are. You can also log onto LoTW and look at
the most recent QSO'S.

If there is an easier way I would like to know about it.


Ed W3NR
_______________________________________________
fldigi-alpha mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha

Jim,

Here is how I do it. First I go back to LOTW and press the "Most Recent QSOs" button near the bottom, which give me a list of what they already have, and I take the last date and call sign for my starting point for the next upload. Now that I know where I want to start, I go over to FLDIGI and open the Logbook-ADIF-Export and select the fields TQSL wants to see, the most important ones being the date and time on. Then go over to the log and click on each of the check boxes for QSO's you want to send to LOTW. Then click OK, Name it with a unique name, (I use sequential numbering i.e. W6HGF1234.adi), and run it through TQSL and upload to LOTW.

For Dave, I kind of like the XLOG method of numbering the QSO's and letting me specify the qso number range for the extraction process, it is much, much easier than all the little check boxes after a long contest, and I have never run across an occasion yet where I needed to skip a qso in the middle.

Also a note, I really miss the auto fill 599 on the log, something I got used to and now sometimes miss and have to go back and fix before submissions.

Al  W6HGF

_______________________________________________
fldigi-alpha mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha

It sounds like some additional fields, LOTW-sent, LOTW-rcvd, might be needed. As well as a way merge LOTW downloads and create LOTW uploads. Since I have never used LOTW (me bad) I need guidance from those who have. Describe what you need in terms of fields, dialogs, selection criteria, etc. for the interface.

Dave
Dave,

Here is an example from this weekend 160 contest. 2 QSO's from FLDIGI with all the default boxes checked comes out in adif like this.
File: export.adif
<ADIF_VER:5>2.2.3
<PROGRAMID:6>fldigi
<PROGRAMVERSION:8>3.21.0BE
<EOH>
<CALL:5>W0ANT<FREQ:8>1.824918<MODE:2>CW<QSO_DATE:8>20110130<QSO_DATE_OFF:8>20110130<TIME_OFF:4>0547<TIME_ON:4>0547<EOR>
<CALL:5>K6SRZ<FREQ:8>1.827190<MODE:2>CW<NAME:4>Alan<QSO_DATE:8>20110130<QSO_DATE_OFF:8>20110130<RST_RCVD:3>599<RST_SENT:3>599<TIME_OFF:4>0611<TIME_ON:4>0611<EOR>

When run through TQSL which is the LOTW edit and signing/encryption program, they format the same data like this.
<CALL:5>W0ANT
<BAND:4>160M
<MODE:2>CW
<QSO_DATE:8>20110130
<TIME_ON:6>054700
<FREQ:8>1.824918
<EOR>
<CALL:5>K6SRZ
<BAND:4>160M
<MODE:2>CW
<QSO_DATE:8>20110130
<TIME_ON:6>061100
<FREQ:8>1.827190
<EOR>

So you can see much of the data is not used by LOTW, that we like to keep in our logbooks for future reference or paper qsl's. Also one difference worth noting in naming conventions, LOTW uses the suffix .adi instead of .adif There was a great write-up about LOTW in this months QST on the benefits of the system. You might be surprised how many new awards like triple-play you have already qualified for, once you upload your logbook to LOTW. One more important reason I use the system, is that I have thought about future researchers and even current ones, what fun it would be to have the original W6AM logs, or W1AW logs from the turn of the century to examine a hundred years from now. LOTW should become a legacy archive for those of us that come and go, that can be there for our great grand children to discover someday, and enjoy a part of our hobby sometime in the future, the way we do today.

Al  W6HGF
_______________________________________________
fldigi-alpha mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha

Reply via email to