On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:30 AM, RedBugz Software <[email protected]> wrote: > It's maven integration has been pretty good as far as I can tell,
I should mention, we did recently find a bug in their deploy support. Hudson will optionally deploy your artifacts for you after a build, but they wrote their own code to do it--it doesn't deploy through maven (though you can have the project do that as well). However, it fails to deploy flex-mojos artifacts correctly because of the rb.swc artifacts. It strips the .rb and deploys them as .swcs, overwriting our normal swcs and breaking rb.swc dependencies. We're supposed to have a bug logged against them for it, and we worked around it by deploying through maven instead of using their built-in deploy support. Logan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
