One other thing - is there a flex-mojos/project that includes swf tests anywhere? I tried setting up my Hudson to build from this tag:
http://svn.sonatype.org/flexmojos/tags/flex-mojos-2.0.3 but it only seems to run Java tests. Only one subproject seems to include AS compilation/testing ("Flex-mojos testing support"), but this reports: "[WARNING] Skipping test run. Runner not found: D:\Data\Java Builds \Hudson\jobs\flex-mojos test\workspace\flex-mojos-2.0.3\testing-support \target\test-classes\TestRunner.swf" Could someone with commit privileges add a simple "Hello World" test class into that project to see if the problem is specific to my project rather than my environment? Many thanks, Bob On Feb 11, 4:50 pm, Bob <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, I'm no further on to be honest, but here's where I'm at: > > We moved build servers, so I'm on a brand new machine, and I took the > opportunity to try Hudson out, and am impressed. > > However, the timeout issue still occurs with 2.0M10 in Hudson. > > I've tried setting <flexUnitCommand> to both the setup described > here:http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos/browse_thread/thread/c6dc85... > and the absolute path to my flash player: > [code] > <plugin> > <groupId>info.flex-mojos</groupId> > <artifactId>flex-compiler-mojo</ > artifactId> > <configuration> > <flexUnitCommand> > <argument>c:/Progra~1/Adobe/ > flashplayer_10_sa_debug.exe</argument> > <argument>$ > {project.build.testOutputDirectory}/TestRunner.swf</argument> > </flexUnitCommand> > </configuration> > </plugin> > [/code] > > to no avail - the first method times out in the same way (as I would > expect) and the second never returns (15 mins and counting at the time > of writing). There is no flash player window on the server, hich was > my initial thought. > > Can anyone think of anything I can test? The user running Hudson is a > local admin on the machine, so I don't believe its a permissions > issue, also my command-line tests have been carried out using the same > user. > > I've re-tested the command-line approach on the new machine, that > still works as before; it is solely in Continuum/Hudson that it > doesn't. > > I'm going to have to roll back to 2.0M9 again as I have no more time > to spend on this, if I have any brain waves I'll let you know. > > The only other thing worthy of note is that this is within a multi- > module maven project, but it looks like flex-mojos is also, and that > works on hudson? > > Thanks for any time anyone can spend on this. > > On Dec 24 2008, 12:04 pm, Bob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > One thing I have just noticed, is that something, presumably the > > cmd.exe process, has written a zero-byte "url.dll" into the parent > > directory of where Continuum builds from. I can't offer any > > explanation for that as yet, but wondered if this turned on any lights > > for anyone? I'll try to investigate further over the holidays. > > > On Dec 17, 3:58 pm, "Marvin Froeder" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Well, sonatype runs on Hudson too. And everything here is maven based. > > > So > > > far hudson does a great job. > > > > This is probably an environment related issue, but I have not idea what is > > > going on. > > > Does anyone know if there is any limitations on running plexus cli on CI? > > > > Did you both tried to define <flexUnitCommand> pointing to real flash > > > player > > > location?! > > > > VELO > > > > May be, it isn't find your environment variables. > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:50 PM, codebeneath <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Hudson and maven integrate beautifully. We have been using that > > > > combination for over 6 months with no problems. I would recommend > > > > it. > > > > > On the topic of this thread, I see the same problem with the flexunit > > > > timeout in hudson. Command line works as expected, but hudson gets > > > > stuck as you describe for continuum. I worked great with version > > > > 2.0M9 and around the time 2.0M10 came out, it stop working. Plugging > > > > back 2.0M9 back into the poms did not fix the problem. (the maven > > > > download of 2.0M10 and its transitive dependencies may need to be > > > > cleared from the local maven repo... have not had time to try that > > > > yet) > > > > > Jeff > > > > > On Dec 17, 9:15 am, Bob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Logan, > > > > > > I appreciate your time on this thanks for the quick responses. > > > > > > The command works fine run manually, it is just Continuum that seems > > > > > to demonstrate the problem. > > > > > > I don't know anything off the top of my head that would cause > > > > > Continuum to handle it differently, I'll try and run some tests with > > > > > it to see if I can shed any more light. > > > > > > I'm a bit short of time I can spend on it at the moment, so I may not > > > > > get back to you straight away, but once again thanks for you efforts. > > > > > I don't want you to think I'm just going to disappear... > > > > > > Out of interest - how would you rate Hudson? I hadn't heard of it when > > > > > I set Continuum up, so I just went with that, because of its close > > > > > links with Maven. I'd be interested to know how well Hudson integrates > > > > > with Maven and what you think of it. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Bob > > > > > > On Dec 17, 12:19 am, "RedBugz Software" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Bob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Looking at the source for FlexUnitLauncher.java, it has changed > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > way it is launching the process between M9 and M10, now using the > > > > > > > plexus cli utils, which I'm not familiar with, instead of plain > > > > > > > Runtime.exec(): > > > > > > > This is on Windows XP by the way. Let me know if I can test > > > > > > > further, > > > > > > > I am somewhat stumped. Our WinXP boxes here are working just fine on > > > > > > M10 running tests. Switching to Plexus cli utils still calls > > > > > > Runtime.exec() under the covers, it just wraps it in some better > > > > > > handling. > > > > > > > If you run what comes after commandline: manually does it work? > > > > > > > This only fails when run in continuum, correct? > > > > > > > You can try and override the command in your pom (<flexUnitCommand>) > > > > > > so it will run the Flash Player directly instead of using rundll32. > > > > > > Other than that, is there any other reason continuum would have an > > > > > > unusual command line setup (I'm not familiar with the specifics of > > > > > > continuum as we use hudson)? > > > > > > > Logan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
