You should be able to use the downloadable trial version from
Macromedia.com and specify your serial number during the install.  I
don't think that the CD you receive from MM is anything but the same
installer you'll get off their web site.

Whether or not you specify the serial number, you should be able
install Flex as a .war on any J2EE server or have the installer
install the full version of JRun with Flex instead.


-Cliff


On 5/12/05, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well the actual legal (Commercial) FLEX license is being sent
> (currently FEDEX) but i have the serial, and simply used the
> downloadable version to install.
> 
> that being said, once i provide the serial it doesn't ask how i want
> it installed, but simply installs the WAR?
> 
> am i missing something from this equation?
> 
> On 5/12/05, Cliff Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you purchase a Flex license it comes with a full license of JRun.
> > When you run the Flex installer you can either have it create a .war
> > file to deploy to an existing J2EE server, or choose to install JRun4
> > on your server and then put Flex on top of it.  The same is true of
> > ColdFusion MX7: if you spring for an Enterprise license you can
> > install CF with a full version of JRun4, or as a .war to deploy to any
> > other J2EE server.  You could also install CFMX7 in Standalone mode,
> > but IMHO this would be waste since you'd be sacrificing the full J2EE
> > capability (Servlets, JSPs, EJBs, etc) as well as some other features
> > in CFMX7 Enterprise Edition.  If you want to deploy CFMX7 and Flex on
> > top of the same J2EE server (be it the "free" JRun you get with the
> > CF/Flex licenses or any other J2EE server) you're still going to need
> > the CFMX7 Enterprise edition.
> >
> > If you are looking for the most cost-effective route, you can do the 
> > following:
> >
> > (1) Buy a Flex license and install it on a box with the full version
> > of JRun that's included,
> > (2) Buy a CFMX7 Standard license and install it on a different box in
> > Standalone mode
> >
> > You might also be able to run them side by side on the same box, but
> > usually I think MM will discourage that behavior since having two JRun
> > servers on the same box will probably cause issues.  Port conflicts
> > immediately jump to mind since different parts of the J2EE machinery
> > will probably try to bind to the same default ports, although you
> > could probaby adjust the .xml config files to resolve this.  However
> > you're also going to add a lot more overhead to your hardware by
> > running two separate J2EE servers on the same box.  If your company is
> > willing to spring for the hefty price tag of Flex, is the difference
> > between CFMX7 Standard and Enterprise really that significant?
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Cliff
> >
> >
> > On 5/11/05, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In order to install FLEX you need an existing Java Application Server,
> > > now we own CF7 Standard not Enterprise.
> > >
> > > 1) Would it be more cost effective to buy JRUN 4 (standalone) and
> > > deploy CF7/FLEX war files to JRUN4
> > >
> > > 2) Buy / Updared CF7 Standard to Enterpise and deploy FLEX via this route.
> > >
> > > I'm not really up to speed on whats what in terms of Java Application
> > > Server(s) but need to have a setup where i can hopefully have FLEX/CF
> > > running under the one port (was going to use a CFIMPORT capability but
> > > CF7 Standard has a software license restriction on JSP apparently).
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Scott Barnes
> > > http://www.mossyblog.com
> > > http://www.flexcoder.com (Coming Soon)
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Scott Barnes
> http://www.mossyblog.com
> http://www.flexcoder.com (Coming Soon)
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
>


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to