Thanks Randy.
I never had an issue with Josh and didn't know who he was until he
said fo.
The problem is that I've had several posts that he's responded to
negatively.
I've asked him to get off my back.
He said, "No I won't" then the fo.
The reason the fo is significant is that it's not discussion - it's
just a cowardly give in to analytical reasoning.
People speak - we exchange words of meaning. He broke down and let
out some level of anger that again, I say he just must have already
been having a bad day.
it's off my table. perhaps you can tell him to not respond negatively
to my posts and get off my back, because he said very clearly "No I
won't".
-r
On Sep 1, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Randy Martin wrote:
OK. I’ve been reading this thread with some interest. After all,
everyone needs a little humor in their daily life. J I’m amazed
that we, as human beings, still let words anger us so much. So what
if someone tells you to FO? “Sticks and stones may break your bones,
but words…” If you lived in New York or New Jersey, you’d probably
hear the f-word several hundred times a day in normal conversation.
They’d just tell you to “forget about it.”
So, Robert, my suggestion to you (and it’s just a suggestion – I
would never presume to tell you what to do) is to just let it go. If
you have an issue with Josh, please take it off-list. After all, it
is just between you and Josh. Also, just as a last little
observation, Robert, “thou dost protest too much, methinks.” In the
immortal words of the Eagles on their Hell Freezes Over comeback
album, just “Get Over It.”
Of course, that’s just my opinion. I could be wrong – I’ve been
wrong at least one other time that I can remember. J
~randy
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Robert Thompson
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 3:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Options on ActionScript 3.0 Editing in FLEX
By the way, the Enterprise version, which I'm still in a 30 day
evaluation of, was just released in March (and again I just
discovered it, and you somehow know most people on the list use it,
I've done some searches on the group and see no evidence of that
lofty claim).
How is it you are speaking for everyone that I shouldn't post what I
said below "FDT Enterprise Edition" and you write back a
diplomatically polite, but obvious intended message.
Just leave my posts alone if you don't like them. I share the
excitement of a great new tool discovered, are you pompously speak
for everyone and implicitly tell me to shut up by calling me a
public service announcer.
This is just you and Josh and a few others who appear to want to be
the only people contributing anything here.
Nothing is as clear as the message of Josh to tell me to F____ off.
Yet you ignore that. Hypocrisy.
-r
On Sep 1, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Paul Andrews wrote:
Robert loads of people already know about FDT, many people here and
on flashcoders use it. Nobody here wants anyone acting like some
public service announcer here on the forums. It's highly patronising
to list. It'all going to end in tears.
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Thompson
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 8:38 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Options on ActionScript 3.0 Editing in FLEX
Just as a note on ActionScript 3.0 Editing in FLEX.
Papervision3D just posted news of their contest, endorsed FDT
Enterprise Edition as their preferred ActionScript Editor.
From Papervision3D.org, quote,
"2nd Place- VectorVision - Winner of FDT Enterprise Edition (our
preferred ActionScript editor)"
Papervision3D is a great organization who has dramatically improved
flexcoding possibilities.
FDT + Papervision3D = Great news for everyone.
http://blog.papervision3d.org/
-r
Note: As a recommendation I was given, I note that this is an
appropriately verified post to inform [flexcoders] of important
information. Please do not reply in a counter-productive or
aggressive fashion to good news that provides value to
[flexcoders] :-)
