You can always try a Java Applet. But this suggestion might be off topic!

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Mark Easton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>    I'd be using C++. :)
>
> I already have a C++ application running on our gateway which deals with
> grabbing data from the stations. It then passes that to a parser utility I
> wrote so that would be a good place to reduce the dataset ready for a
> progressive display on a flex chart.
>
> Yep - a very interesting application!
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Josh McDonald
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:34 AM
>
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Re: Creating a Chart With 50,000 Data Points
>
>  I'd look into some intermediary code to reduce your dataset, written in
> something with threads (my first choice would be Java, but that's me). It
> sounds like you're working on some interesting stuff Mark :)
>
> -Josh
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Mark Easton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Thanks Brendan,
>>
>> We are charting observations from a range of sensors and contact inputs.
>> The contact inputs are a special case as they can only have 1 or 0 values.
>> But the sensors include temperature, current, voltage, light, humidity,
>> vibration, motion, gps velocity, gps location, wind speed, wind direction
>> etc.
>>
>> The client does like the the charting features so he wants all of the flex
>> charting cool stuff as well as the ability to see these charts.
>>
>> But that does not mean that I cant look at a combination of approaches.
>> Its a good idea to look at coding a custom chart, and one I will look at
>> closely.
>>
>> Yes I was thinking along the lines of having 2000 plot points. So in the
>> case of a 3 month graph I would start with 120,000 points and need to reduce
>> that to 2000.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
>> Behalf Of *Brendan Meutzner
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 19, 2008 8:51 AM
>> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Re: Creating a Chart With 50,000 Data Points
>>
>>    What kind of charts are you displaying?  I've had amazing success with
>> scrapping the charting framework all together and simply "drawing" the chart
>> programmatically.  Yes, it's a bit more work, and yes it's only feasible if
>> you don't really need a lot of the charting features that come in the
>> framework.  However, the performance difference is huge.
>>
>> The project I applied this on was for financial stock data, and using a
>> custom drawn chart I mention above, along with the concept someone else
>> mentioned by only showing the n-th datapoint interval depending on the
>> overall range being displayed worked quite well.  You're able to keep a
>> consistent number of plot points (I've found 500-750 performs best) no
>> matter what the overall range of data you're displaying.  I say 500-750
>> performs best as I also had a horizontal axis slider which allowed for
>> constantly updating data in the chart.
>>
>> Brendan
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:27 PM, jim.abbott45 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>>   50,000? LOL. ;-)
>>>
>>> On a more serious note, I have to agree with Fotis and Ricky that 50K
>>> data points is too many, both from a (Flash 9 VM at least) performance
>>> perspective and probably also from an Information Visualization
>>> perspective (unless, maybe, your users have 300 dpi monitors).
>>>
>>> There are several standard interaction design and information
>>> visualization techniques which may be useful to you . . .
>>>
>>> 1) Aggregation (as already suggested, take 'N' data points, average
>>> them, and then only display the average value).
>>>
>>> 2) Filtering (by sliders on an axis, by date/time, by structured or
>>> open-ended queries, ...)
>>>
>>> 3) Progressive rendering (sample the entire data set at intervals of
>>> 'N', render those points, then go back and get the data which is
>>> mid-point between the original points, add the new points to the
>>> curve, repeat until desired resolution obtained--or on user demand)
>>>
>>> 4) Non-linear zooming (like idea 1), but allow user to zoom in on a
>>> section of the curve, when they do, add the additional data points to
>>> the curve for the zoomed-in region)
>>>
>>> On a more pragmatic note, you certainly _can_ plot more than 2,000
>>> points. For example, I've personally used Flex to create charts with
>>> over 14,000 points in them, so I know that at least that number is
>>> definitely *possible*. However, the overall rendering time was (as I
>>> recall) over 3 minutes long. More troubling was the fact that the
>>> entire Flex UI become very sluggish once a chart that large was
>>> displayed. I've seen good chart rendering speed ( ~= 2S ) and no UI
>>> sluggishness, up to about 1500 points. I've also been able to render
>>> up to 6,000 points, but it took about 10S for the rendering and the UI
>>> started to become sluggish. From your posting, it sounds like you're
>>> not seeing those rendering speeds. I'd recommend that you experiment
>>> with how you are using the charting objects/API. My experience was
>>> that I was able to see some very noticeable speed-ups simply be
>>> optimizing how I called the charting API (especially w.r.t. how I
>>> loaded the series data). In particular, if your charts are
>>> interactive, try to cache anything you can that doesn't necessarily
>>> change during an interaction (i.e., axis objects).
>>>
>>> Last thought: the new Flash 10 VM (Astro) has support for larger
>>> bitmaps and also can now do hardware-based rendering, apparently. I
>>> haven't tried either of those features myself, but using the v10 VM
>>> _might_ be another way to get a performance boost, etc.
>>>
>>> Good luck!
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "Mark
>>> Easton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > It appears that Flex Charts cannot handle generating charts with large
>>> > DataSets. We tried with 50,000 data points and it thrashed away without
>>> > producing a result after 6 minutes. It was able to plot 2,000 points in
>>> > about 25 seconds.
>>> >
>>> > What is the recommended approach for creating charts from large data
>>> sets.
>>> > The best I can think of is to write some code that will reduce the
>>> data set
>>> > in size yet still provide enough data to represent the graph
>>> accurately.
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> > Ta.
>>> > Mark
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Brendan Meutzner
>> http://www.meutzner.com/blog/
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.6/1797 - Release Date: 11/18/2008
>> 11:23 AM
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee."
>
> Like the cut of my jib? Check out my Flex blog!
>
> :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
> :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> :: http://flex.joshmcdonald.info/
> :: http://twitter.com/sophistifunk
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.6/1797 - Release Date: 11/18/2008
> 11:23 AM
>
>  
>



-- 

Lily Tomlin  - "The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win,
you're still a rat."

Reply via email to