That depends what you mean by better.  In Flex 1.5 you will find very
quickly that the JIT server compiler leaks memory very badly and wont
work with an application of any real size.  For any kind of serious
application the server compilation simply wont work for you.

We use mxmlc called from autoamted ANT builds.  We're pretty attament
about it all.  We have a very well designed build and source control
process that has made real impacts on the quality and reliability of
our solutions.

Yeah, performance isnt stunning, but given that its a two pass
compilation thats not shocking either.

We're hoping for some marked improvement in Flex2.

-- 
Dave Wolf
Cynergy Systems, Inc.
Macromedia Flex Alliance Partner
http://www.cynergysystems.com

Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: 866-CYNERGY



--- In [email protected], "Renaun Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After some more reading I am under the assumption that for development
> of Flex 1.5 apps its better to use the Java web server access to
> compile with caching on.  Is this correct?
> 
> Renaun
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Renaun Erickson" <renaun@> wrote:
> >
> > ## This post is in regard to Flex 1.5 ##
> > 
> > I have finally got around to trying out mxmlc and fastmxmlc with a xml
> > build script.  The purpose was to see if it was faster to use mxmlc to
> > compile on my development environment versus using the web server
> > (accessing the mxml by a url).
> > 
> > I am not seeing a big difference in compile time between the two
> > methods.  I tried RSL's but dont think they are setup correctly.
> > 
> > My big question is how do I get my compile times down on my local
> > development machine?
> > 
> > Renaun
> >
>






--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to