I might be wrong, but I though Laslo parses their language at runtime (in the SWF) instead of compiling the code into SWFs?
Renaun --- In [email protected], "Sanjeeb Patel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Renaun, > > I am sorry .. but I did not get what exactly you meant by << Laslo is > runtime heavy and Flex is compiled>>. > > Would you please elaborate ? > > Thanks, > -San > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Renaun Erickson > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:47 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: FLEX and Open Lazslo Comparision > > One big one is everytime Flex comes up with newer components Laslo > either has to mimic them or create their own version. > > Another is Laslo is runtime heavy and Flex is compiled. > > Renaun > > --- In [email protected], "Sanjeeb Patel" <spatel@> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > I am in the process of comparing the two RIA technologies. > > > > If anyone has done it and can shed some light, I will really > appreciate. > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > -San > > > > > > > > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Search Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
