The size has to do with all the Flex Framework components, yes its bigger but a richer set of components.
Even if Laslo did a lot of interperting at the runtime level it could still have decent performance, I assume its not a problem as Laslo is viable. The richness of Flex Framework is not to be over looked though. They will only keep bringing out more and more components. Renaun --- In [email protected], "Bryan Rieger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Renaun, > > Actually, I'm quite interested in what you mean by that also? > > FWIW - Simple Flex apps seem to be 250k+ while I can spit out a simple > Laszlo swf around 70k. > Of course, the performance does appear to be better in Flex - but I'm > wondering if that's simply not a result of the 8.5 runtime and AS3 - which > OpenLaszlo has yet to implement. > > I'm just getting my feet wet with Flex v2, but have been using OL for quite > a while. > > Bryan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanjeeb Patel > > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:58 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: FLEX and Open Lazslo Comparision > > > > Hi Renaun, > > > > I am sorry .. but I did not get what exactly you meant by << > > Laslo is runtime heavy and Flex is compiled>>. > > > > Would you please elaborate ? > > > > Thanks, > > -San > > > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
