Paul said that the current application was great when it was working, but everyone hated it when it was slow or the internet connection was down. I was not implying that flex doesn't work, or that I couldn't connect to them. I was saying Flex has no built-in mechanism to handle when the connection with the server is severed.
 
I did a little quick research on sharedObjects... So if I need to store more than 10k of data, I need to get the user to change their flash settings? Seems like it's not terribly useful for maintaining a history of additions/changes of data for my app, should the connection between client & server drop. Hopefully I'm misunderstanding this, or Apollo will address these problems.
 
Shan
 
 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hank williams
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 10:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] Re: [Junk E-Mail - MED] [flexcoders] A general Flex application deployment question..



On 7/23/06, Shannon Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Flex, in it's present form, does not handle connectivity issues well.

I'm not sure exactly what you mean by this. I have no problem "connecting" to flash/flex apps. Of course if the internet connection is down then things wont work, but that's not a flex issue.
 

While it's possible to do, Flex can't save anything to the user's local hard drive, so "saved" information is only saved while the browser window is open.

Actually, flash has local sharedObjects that allow an application to save data locally.
 

Maybe some clever Flash guru can make me eat my words :)
 
However, if I understand correctly, Adobe's upcoming technology, Apollo, will allow for this sort of thing (a flex-built desktop app with limited / occasional connections to the server).

I'm not sure he was concerned about occasional connections to the server. He simply said remotely served application.

Shan


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Andrews
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 6:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Junk E-Mail - MED] [flexcoders] A general Flex application deployment question..

My wife works in education and her school subscribes to a remote service
that supplies web based information via the internet. When it works they
love it but it's gotten a pretty awful nickname for the times it doesn't or
is just plain slow.

The important point here is that it's a good application, supplied from a
remote server, but seen as unreliable either due to internet connectivity
problems or speed.

Forgetting the speed problem (there's usually ways to sort that out), I
wondered how people are using Flex as a remotely served application. Are
there good strategies to mitigate connection problems and how do companies
react to the idea of remotely served applications that are
important/critical to the business?

Is the critical desktop application where Flex cannot go (except perhaps by
in-house intranet)?

Paul


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date: 7/21/2006


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date: 7/21/2006



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date: 7/21/2006

__._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date: 7/21/2006

Reply via email to