Thanks, I'll focus on 3.0, though being new to flex and with the docs for 3.0
somewhat thin now, not sure what I'll be able to figure out. I hope adobe
provides some straightforward db oriented tutorials, web services play only
a minor role in most of my fellow developer's workload, db interaction is
where it's at.

I'd appreciate anyone else's input on these subjects.
 

Steve Hueners wrote:
> 
> On 11/10/07, Michael Pengi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>  I have read a
>>  couple of times that Visual Studio might be considered 'ahead' of Flex
>>  Builder.
> 
> VS is a far more polished IDE than FB2 - FB3 will close the gap a bit
> but not all the way. But some interesting things are developing in
> terms of delivering sample code and the framework documentation might
> actually be easier to digest than MS's.
> 
>>But my #1 interest is being able to wire up sql databases to the ui
>>  in the simplest manner possible, ie not a ton of code.
> 
> I'm on the front side of the same learning curve but my impression is
> that the UI is way easier to code for than .net provided you code to
> best practices and patterns. It looks to me like opportunity to map
> the same objects on both sides of the data tier
> (http://flex.sys-con.com/read/418939.htm#) could give us the best of
> both worlds - the advantage of sproc-based data-managment filtered by
> .net assemblies feeding the Flex's rich UI.
> 
>> Can someone point me to the best
>>  example app of this type? Most demo apps I've seen are not mostly about
>>  crud.
>>
> 
> If you want to focus that narrowly on the CRUD aspect to Flex code you
> probably want to dig into the code generation capabilities and
> limitations coming in Flex 3 - not a great many tutes speaking to that
> yet -
> (http://www.onflex.org/ted/2007/09/flex-3-beta-2-code-debug-profiler.php)
> 
>>  I've read about Cairngorm, but am not really sure were it fits into the
>> flex
>>  scheme.
> 
> Framework choices explored at:
> http://www.asserttrue.com/articles/2007/10/17/silvafug-application-frameworks-presentation
> 
>>  Finally, would it be good to start with Flex 3 beta 2, or should I stick
>>  with Flex 2 for now?
> 
> Flex 3 imo.
> 
> --steve...
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Flex-for-database-apps--compare-to-.net-tf4784184.html#a13739323
Sent from the FlexCoders mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to