I'll tell you honestly Anatole, I've been an enterprise developer for 25
years.  From EDLIN to Flex, I've seen it; so please don't propose that
you have some un-known insight to software development.  This list, and
the Macromedia based essence of theme for Flex that has been a huge
success, doesn't care about you or me.  I appreciate that you have been
able to benefit from Flex's success; but I question the motive to try
and tell Adobe how to run their business.  If you like the product,
cool.  If you don't, step off.

-TH

--- In [email protected], "Anatole Tartakovsky"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess, the majority of the group tends to like the way things are
now.
> That is hardly surprising given initial posting that most people who
do not
> like the current solution would unsubscribe.
> It also came to the light that enterprise developers have some
restrictions
> in selection of the client (email) software and problems with getting
too
> many messages. It is also obvious ( by monitoring the messages for few
month
> back) that the questions on "enterprise" topics are rarely followed
and
> some design questions are answered on a different level then the
original
> question. As a result, we see fewer of such messages
> lately. Potentially, enterprise part of Flex business might not be
getting
> fare share of attention.
>
> So, here is the question - if we create separate list to see the need
for
> enterprise list - would Adobe be willing to include links to it in the
usual
> places/promote it/assign moderators?
>
> Sincerely,
> Anatole Tartakovsky
> Farata Systems
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 6:01 PM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > On 19-Jun-08, at 2:03 PM, brucewhealton wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we need groups for different users at different experience
> > levels. I think this list is so big that it is hard to find a
> > response or thread, especially when one posts a question and wants
to
> > find out if someone responded. I have to look and look to see if I
> > can find that thread anywhere, and it gets confusing when one sees
so
> > many similar, though different threads. I'd like a feature to show
me
> > threads that include messages where I've posted comments, questions,
> > or etc.
> >
> >
> > I tend to be one that prefers one list, and monitoring all
things.... (I
> > like to see what is out there and what else is going on with the
tech on all
> > levels). However with a little thought about this, the reality is
this, if
> > it stays as one, most are creating rules to manage or delete, etc.
anyways.
> > If we split, the same applies in some form or another. no one will
ever be
> > happy on all levels.
> >
> > So if the powers that be decide to split, go for it.... I will just
> > subscribe to all the relevant ones I wish to monitor and organize
how i want
> > (probably all dumped into a flex folder as it is now). But it gives
those
> > who wish for more relevance more power to do so. Either way I can
sort and
> > have the exact same info in my inbox. It just gives those who want a
more
> > targeted inbox the ability to do so. My only suggestion is to not
over
> > split. Pick your 5-10 (or what ever the magic number seems to be)
and go for
> > it.
> >
> > It is all a matter or preference, but one way (to split to a point)
seems
> > to offer more flexibility.
> >
> > Not even $0.02...... but....
> >
> > dnk
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to