Good enough, best of luck. -TH
--- In [email protected], "Anatole Tartakovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thank you for the honesty, Tim. > >>This list, and the Macromedia based essence of theme for Flex that has > been a huge success, doesn't care about [enterprise developers like]you or > me<< > I wonder how you got that impression. Are there many people that feel that > way? > > Flex has enterprise side to it and is promoted as enterprise grade tool. I > do believe that Adobe targets that market as there are millions of java > developers that are looking for new technologies to move into - with a > majority of them in enterprise field. How they perceive the product and > support does affect you and me in (hopefully) long run. > > Anyway, enterpriseflex group is created, anyone is welcome to join. I will > post formal invitation with list of the topics it will cover as soon as all > facets are ready and tested > > Thank you, > Anatole Tartakovsky > > > > Thank you > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Tim Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I'll tell you honestly Anatole, I've been an enterprise developer for > > 25 years. From EDLIN to Flex, I've seen it; so please don't propose that > > you have some un-known insight to software development. This list, and the > > Macromedia based essence of theme for Flex that has been a huge success, > > doesn't care about you or me. I appreciate that you have been able to > > benefit from Flex's success; but I question the motive to try and tell Adobe > > how to run their business. If you like the product, cool. If you don't, > > step off. > > > > -TH > > > > --- In [email protected], "Anatole Tartakovsky" > > anatole.tartakovsky@ wrote: > > > > > > I guess, the majority of the group tends to like the way things are now. > > > That is hardly surprising given initial posting that most people who do > > not > > > like the current solution would unsubscribe. > > > It also came to the light that enterprise developers have some > > restrictions > > > in selection of the client (email) software and problems with getting too > > > many messages. It is also obvious ( by monitoring the messages for few > > month > > > back) that the questions on "enterprise" topics are rarely followed and > > > some design questions are answered on a different level then the original > > > question. As a result, we see fewer of such messages > > > lately. Potentially, enterprise part of Flex business might not be > > getting > > > fare share of attention. > > > > > > So, here is the question - if we create separate list to see the need for > > > enterprise list - would Adobe be willing to include links to it in the > > usual > > > places/promote it/assign moderators? > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > Anatole Tartakovsky > > > Farata Systems > > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 6:01 PM, dnk d.k.emaillists@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 19-Jun-08, at 2:03 PM, brucewhealton wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe we need groups for different users at different experience > > > > levels. I think this list is so big that it is hard to find a > > > > response or thread, especially when one posts a question and wants to > > > > find out if someone responded. I have to look and look to see if I > > > > can find that thread anywhere, and it gets confusing when one sees so > > > > many similar, though different threads. I'd like a feature to show me > > > > threads that include messages where I've posted comments, questions, > > > > or etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > I tend to be one that prefers one list, and monitoring all things.... > > (I > > > > like to see what is out there and what else is going on with the tech > > on all > > > > levels). However with a little thought about this, the reality is this, > > if > > > > it stays as one, most are creating rules to manage or delete, etc. > > anyways. > > > > If we split, the same applies in some form or another. no one will ever > > be > > > > happy on all levels. > > > > > > > > So if the powers that be decide to split, go for it.... I will just > > > > subscribe to all the relevant ones I wish to monitor and organize how i > > want > > > > (probably all dumped into a flex folder as it is now). But it gives > > those > > > > who wish for more relevance more power to do so. Either way I can sort > > and > > > > have the exact same info in my inbox. It just gives those who want a > > more > > > > targeted inbox the ability to do so. My only suggestion is to not over > > > > split. Pick your 5-10 (or what ever the magic number seems to be) and > > go for > > > > it. > > > > > > > > It is all a matter or preference, but one way (to split to a point) > > seems > > > > to offer more flexibility. > > > > > > > > Not even $0.02...... but.... > > > > > > > > dnk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
