John, The current hardware is not QSK as the time required to switch the TR relays at this point is 50ms minimum. This doesn't mean that someone (including FlexRadio) will not figure out a way to modify the hardware for QSK. It just means that the current hardware will not do better than Semi Break in.
Which brings me to ask: Can you define "true semi-break-in"? Without a clear definition, I have a hard time qualifying whether our radio will meet your expectations. Suffice it to say that FlexRadio is VERY interested in continuing to improve the CW operation of the SDR-1000. Eric Wachsmann FlexRadio Systems > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > radio.biz] On Behalf Of W2AGN > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:52 AM > To: Lee A Crocker > Cc: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Eham Review > > The CW question is what keeps me from throwing in my money. Is there any > chance we will see QSK, or even true "semi-break-in" CW with the FLEX? I > fear some may say, "why make new technology accomodate an obsolete > mode?" If that is the case, and CW will remain an orphan in the > Flexradio, then I wiould be better off looking elsewhere. > > -- > _ _ _ _ _ > / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ John L. Sielke > ( W ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( G ) ( N ) http://w2agn.net > \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/
