Elad Yarkoni wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > I know you hate it... and this topic seems to be > endless on FGFS-Devel group, .... AND this discussion does > not belong in here, but you guys are the only ones I trust... > so here goes: > > am I going to replace my TNT2Ultra with a GeForceMX2 ? > (you are going to decide for me)
I can't decide for you. > FGFS runs nicely on my TNT2U (I think it's the latets > debianized packacge, 0.7.8), but the MX is cheap (60$) > and, seems to be a lot better. However, no benchmark > actually put both cards on the row and see which > performs better. The big advantage of a GeForce [whatever] to a TNT [whatever] is the T&L setup - something that makes FGFS much faster. But the difference in speed depends totally on your CPU. I guess that a TNT2Ultra might be faster than a GeForce2MX on a 2 GHz Athlon. But on a Pentium 100 the GeForce2MX is much faster. If FGFS runs fast enough for you on your TNT2U, why should you change it? Wait a bit longer and save a bit more money. Then you'll perhaps get GeFroce2Ti for a bit more. Or even a GeForce3 or whatever. Time is working for you (and after you've bought it it's sort of working against you...) CU, Christian -- The idea is to die young as late as possible. -- Ashley Montague Whoever that is/was; (c) by Douglas Adams would have been better... _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
