Erik Hofman wrote: > David Megginson wrote: > >> We might be approaching a point that we'll need separate stable and >> development CVS branches. The stable branch should have bug-fixes >> only, while the development branch can have bleeding-edge new code for >> people to try out and review. The question is whether Curt's willing >> to put up with the extra headache of maintaining two branches, and >> whether people are willing to submit two sets of any bug-fix patches >> (I'd guess yes for the latter, at least). >> >> Of course, that also implies keeping two branches of the base >> package. Ouch. > > > I guess that for fgats you realy don't want to use the latest code > anyway. I guess 0.8.0 is a good candidate for both stable, and fgats ...
Ey, its actually called fgatd ... Erik _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
