Jon Berndt writes: > Thank you for playing nice. :-) I have no qualms at all about what you are > asking for. It's the people that are coding it that have to answer to that. > I think it's great if you can come up with a much better, versatile, > "correct" and robust model than we have, now. If you do, I have some people > that I would put you in touch with at Langley (seriously). > > However, if possible, I would very much like to have the elevation at > lat/lon specified locations.
You know, the code to do both what you want and what Andy wants is already done and like Norman said, has been in place for about a year now. > > Does anyone have a reason why such interface should not be duly > > granted to the poor YASim developer? Speak now, or forever hold your, > > ... whatever. > > <silence ... somewhere off in the distance, a cat barks.> Ok, umm, alright, you can have it. :-) Curt. -- Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project Twin Cities [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Minnesota http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt http://www.flightgear.org _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
