On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:25:58 -0400 "Norman Vine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Jon S Berndt writes: >> >>Yes. The one foggy point in my mind is what problems (if >>any) might be associated with a floating CG (i.e. from >>fuel burnoff, etc.). > >IMHO You need two (2) CG's. > >1) the 'reference' < static > CG usually determined from >manufacturer > specs or something similar for use in FGFS for >reference purposes. > >2) The 'actual' < dynamic > CG of the aircraft, as >determined by vehicle > loading for use in the FDM >
Yes, this is one thing that was thrown about some weeks ago in the discussion. I think it's the only real way to go. Jon _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
