"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > It may be that in most cases the CG doesn't move enough from frame to > frame to have a noticable visual effect. However, it seems like in > the long run we would be a lot better off using some fixed reference > point on the airframe, rather than the CG. In some cases the CG could > move far enough to produce a noticable visual jump/glitch. Why make > ourselves subject to that when we don't have to? >
Absolutely, I agree. The "position" (lon/lat/alt) should always move smoothly. If the FDM needs to normalize that to an airframe origin in order (or initial cg) to ensure smooth motion, then that's what it should do. Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
