Jim Wilson writes: > Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > * Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 04 June 2003 15:50: > > > Unless some things can be smoother or better with a faster CPU, like panning > > > the view or spinning the trim wheels. This is a hackish fix taking away that > > > potential benefit. Trust me, you do not want to increase the trim wheel > > > interval! > > > > Huh? Trust me, you don't want the trigger frequency of repeatable buttons to > > vary with the cpu clock. Learn from your favorite OS. The keyboard repeat > > rate is always constant, no matter if your cpu is 133MHz or 2.8GHz. Arguing > > about this is pointless. :-P > > This isn't an OS and IMHO it isn't a pointless arguement. I really like the > fact that the trim wheel control is more repsonsive on my faster computer.
It would be nice to have the same deg/sec response so that faster computers would do it in smaller/smoother step sizes. I think this is what Jim is saying. Regards, Curt. -- Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project Twin Cities curt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at' flightgear.org Minnesota http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt http://www.flightgear.org _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
