Erik Hofman writes: > Well, yeah. > How about color changes due to sunrise/sunset or even plain white > illuminated objects after sunset. > > It might well be there is something not right in there, but it is much > better than what it was. Maybe we should remove the lighting tables > after all?
On my monitor, the first screen shot looks much worse with the new colors. The 2nd is really no comparison becuase it is all dark. The new way simply eliminates any tiny amount of ambient light which probably is not any more realistic than before. The 3rd shot looks nicer, but that's just the sky which you say hasn't changed. Maybe what we need is to be able to control the r/g/b values independently in the diffuse and ambient lookup tables so we can blend in some orangish/redish illumination at dusk/dawn. On my monitor (and IMO), the first shot (which is really the only one that shows the ground with enough light to be usable to gauge the differences) looks much worse with the new scheme. Regards, Curt. -- Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project Twin Cities curt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at' flightgear.org Minnesota http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt http://www.flightgear.org _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
