This is all very true, especially in the open source world. However, speaking as the flightgear project maintainer, I get the sense that we are starting to collect a number of half finished (or just barely started) aircraft that really aren't coherent or flyable yet. I realize building aircraft for FlightGear is a ***lot*** of work, and I don't want to knock the contributions that everyone has made, they are very welcome. But the flip side is that a new user who is trying flightgear for the very first time might have to go through several aircraft before they find one that flies plausibly through all the normal flight regimes.
Agreed. But that's really a FlightGear issue.
What I've been thinking of is setting up a flag somehow that could be checked to indicate which aircraft probably shouldn't be included in the official base package archive.
Erik
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
