Oops, yes - you're right, of course. LeeE
On Sunday 14 December 2003 23:46, Josh Babcock wrote: > B-36. And they are different types, 6 radials and 4 turbojets. > > Josh > > Lee Elliott wrote: > > >On Sunday 14 December 2003 22:55, David Culp wrote: > > > > > >>>I've tried generating one with eight engines - can I just manually add > >>>another couple of engine entries to the generated file or are there > >>> > >>> > >other > > > > > >>>bits of info in the generated file that would need amending, in > >>> > >>> > >addition > > > > > >>>to adding the extra engine entries? > >>> > >>> > >>Sure, that would work fine. The engines are numbered left-to-right > >> > >> > >starting > > > > > >>with zero, so you would add a new engine[4] and re-number the rest of > >> > >> > >the > > > > > >>engines, then add an engine[9]. > >> > >>Aeromatic gives you one fuel tank for each engine (plus one center > >> > >> > >tank), so > > > > > >>you should add two more tanks, one for each new engine. This isn't > >>absolutely necessary, but it makes it easier to get the fuel burn > >> > >> > >balanced > > > > > >>right. > >> > >> > >>Dave > >>-- > >>**************************** > >>David Culp > >>davidculp2[at]comcast.net > >>**************************** > >> > >> > > > >That's fine - I wouldn't bother changing it in that case because the only > >other 'a/c' that I can think of that might be a problem was that giant > >Ekranoplane - that had at least umpteen engines, in various places:) > > > >LeeE > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Flightgear-devel mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel > > _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
