Re: [Flightgear-devel]

[Josh Babcock]

Personally, I think the nose VRP makes a lot of sense.  I think people 
are trying to make this a lot more complicated than it is.  It's just a 
simple solution to a small problem.  I vote Yea.

Josh

Jon Berndt wrote:

I give up. Sort of.

I just want things to work out properly between the FDM and the 3D model.
JSBSim now can provide the lat/lon/alt of a fixed point on the aircraft.
This includes the possibility of providing an offset from the initial CG to
the current CG. We can provide whatever is desired. I've proposed a solution
that many of us agreed on at one point, and which I think makes sense given
the perspectives of the two camps (FDM and 3D Model).
I've made my argument. You can take it, or provide a different solution.
We'll be happy to provide whatever is requested.
Jon



_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
 



_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel