Josh Babcock wrote:
Personally, I think the nose VRP makes a lot of sense. I think people are trying to make this a lot more complicated than it is. It's just a simple solution to a small problem. I vote Yea.
The only thing important here is that the reported position from the FDM is fixed. If it is the nose, then so be it. The IG
can deal with it.
Jon Berndt wrote:
I give up. Sort of.
I just want things to work out properly between the FDM and the 3D model.
JSBSim now can provide the lat/lon/alt of a fixed point on the aircraft.
This includes the possibility of providing an offset from the initial CG to
the current CG. We can provide whatever is desired. I've proposed a solution
that many of us agreed on at one point, and which I think makes sense given
the perspectives of the two camps (FDM and 3D Model).
I've made my argument. You can take it, or provide a different solution. We'll be happy to provide whatever is requested.
-- Russ
Conway's Law: "The structure of a system tends to mirror the
structure of the group producing it."
-- Mel Conway Datamation (1968)_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
