David Culp said:

> > > Would anyone be interested in an autoflight subsystem that acts as a
> > > higher-level controller of the autopilot?  If been thinking of
> > > making one to avoid lots of nasal code [...]
> >
> Andy Ross said:
>
> > Is this exactly the kind of high level glue task that a scripting
> > language is good for?  Honestly, my thinking would be exactly the
> > opposite: replace the C++ stuff with Nasal/properties where possible.
> 
> Nothing personal -:)
> One problem is I know C++, and I barely know nasal.  I don't even know if what 
> I want to do is possible with nasal.  I can only spend so many days playing 
> with it, so C++ would be most efficient for me.  
> 

On the surface it sounds like Andy is right.  But maybe I don't understand the
objective.

Would this do things like implement auto land mode?  How would that work?

Best,

Jim


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to