David Culp said: > > > Would anyone be interested in an autoflight subsystem that acts as a > > > higher-level controller of the autopilot? If been thinking of > > > making one to avoid lots of nasal code [...] > > > Andy Ross said: > > > Is this exactly the kind of high level glue task that a scripting > > language is good for? Honestly, my thinking would be exactly the > > opposite: replace the C++ stuff with Nasal/properties where possible. > > Nothing personal -:) > One problem is I know C++, and I barely know nasal. I don't even know if what > I want to do is possible with nasal. I can only spend so many days playing > with it, so C++ would be most efficient for me. >
On the surface it sounds like Andy is right. But maybe I don't understand the objective. Would this do things like implement auto land mode? How would that work? Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel