Erik Hofman wrote: > Boris Koenig wrote: > > Hi again ! > > > > I am just about trying to add some test-hooks to FlightGear, but > > wouldn't like to have to rebuild the whole FlightGear build tree each > > time (~ 350 MB ), just for 2-3 added small test-functions, hence I > > came up with the following idea: > > > > How about adding a sub-directory "lib" to FlightGear/data/Nasal which > > could then keep plugins that implement external Nasal functions ? > > > What do you think ? > > I don't particulalry like the idea. I'de much rather concentrate on > imporving a FlightSimulator than on extening a scripting language. That > way the number of bindings to Nasal are as low as possible which nakes > it easier to use. > > I realize there might be a difference between people who want a > scripting language to do everything they need and people who don't want > a scripting language except for some very specific tasks. > > I am leaning towards the later (for FligthGear at least).
I wouldn't like to see FlightGear becoming the swiss knife of everybody's need. I would prefer spending time to modularize even more FG and put more in SimGear. This way, everybody could use the library in their own program for the purpose they wish. -Fred _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
