On 21/01/2005 at 18:38 Durk Talsma wrote:

>On Friday 21 January 2005 16:51, David Luff wrote:
>> I'd like to overhaul my loading of GA aircraft models properly - instead
>of
>> pulling them out of the installed aircraft, I think some dedicated AI
>> models should be available to help avoid this kind of problem.  Dave
>Martin
>> - do I remember you saying that you had done / intended to do low-poly
>> count versions of the pa28 and c172 at some point?  If so, they would be
>> very useful.
>>
>David, earlier, I seemed to remember that you were leaning toward
>integrating 
>your AI/ATC code with Dave Culp's AIModel code. In the light of this, 
>wouldn't it be a more feasable approach to start thinking about ways to do

>this and eventually phase out your model animation code? I'm not
>suggesting 
>you should do this, but in the light of your earlier mail, it would seem a

>logical step. Any thoughts?
>

Yes, I'm still inclined to go this way (integration), but haven't had the
chance to dig into the AIModel code yet.  The comments above were intended
to be somewhat generic, to be implemented in whatever method/branch I wind
up using.  I guess I can comment more inteligently on this without the risk
of suggesting stuff that already exists once I've had a good dig into the
AIModel code, so I'll go and take a look...

Cheers - Dave



This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to