Gerard Robin wrote:
Le mardi 12 juillet 2005 à 07:45 +0200, Mathias Fröhlich a écrit :
</animation>
Yes.
As I last looked into the shadow code, there was some heuristic based on
object names which made some surfaces 'noshadow' ones.
That heuristic gives me false positives with the F-18.
I would vote for dropping that heuristic completely and apply the noshadow
where apprioriate.
Greetings
Mathias
Do you mean that using
"noshadow.myobjectname" or <animation><type>noshadow
are the same and the consequence is "noshadow.myobjectname" is not
useful ?
"noshadow.myobjectname" or <animation><type>noshadow are really the same.
But I think Mathias is talking about the fact that some object parts
were silently not casting shadows
based on their name. Before the noshadow animation exist I was checking
for names like 'disk' for
example so a 'propeller.disk' was not casting shadows.
But in the current cvs only the 'noshadow' name and the <noshadow>
animation are used.
Sorry for the confusion, I realize that I did not talk about this hidden
'feature'.
Harald.
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
