> Bittorrent is faster when it comes to distributing large files. Also
> it doesn't have a search engine (though some clients do, but it's not
> the same as eMule).
..ok, details or urls so I can form an informed opinion?
-
Sorry I should have posted this:
"BitTorrent transfers are typically very fast, because all nodes in a group concentrate on transferring a single file or collection of files. While the original eDonkey2000 client provided little "leech resistance", most new clients have some sort of system to encourage uploaders.
eMule, for example, has a credits system whereby a client rewards other clients that upload to it by increasing their priority in its queue. However, the nature of the eDonkey2000 concept means download speeds tend to be much more variable, although the number of available files is far greater."
also from my own experience, Bittorrent is much faster than eMule.
-Rob
