On Friday 14 April 2006 04:54 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
> Question 1 :
> ========
> Is there any way to configure the EGT for a JSBSim engine?
>
> The 737-300 uses a CFM56-3 engine and the stabilized idle EGT should be
> approximately 475 degrees Celcius although it can be as high as 650 degrees
> Celcius on a hot day in bleed configuration and if it's in a bad condition.

My manual says 360 to 510 degrees.


> The idle EGT in FG (with corrected N1 idle speed - 22%) is 378 degrees C
> which is 100 degrees Celcius lower than it should be.


The turbine model has no way of knowing what a particular engine will display 
for EGT.  It depends not only on the engine's thermodynamics, but also the 
EGT probe placement.  I intended for users to add "offsets and scales" in the 
instrumentation code to bring the EGT in line with expectations.  In fact, I 
at first considered just reporting EGT as a normalized value, since any value 
it provides will be wrong anyway.


> Question 2 :
> ========
> Is there any way to set the N1 and N2 spool rates?
> The current spooling rates are not realistic at all.
>
> If you increase the thrust levers a small bit the N1 and N2 "jump" up too
> fast. Looks fine for a "throttle to the firewall" jab but not for small
> changes in thrust level settings. At a guess I'd say that the spooling
> rates are hardcoded... 

Wrong.  The spooling rates in FGTurbine are a function of the bypass ratio.  
Increase the bypass ratio to get slower acceleration.

> and don't take the thrust level settings into account.

This is something I had been meaning to add, making the acceleration rate a 
function of rpm too, so that the slowest acceleration occurs at the lowest 
rpms.  As it is now the spool-up rate is constant over the entire range of 
rpms. 


> Also the N1 and N2 seem to hit a brick wall when they reach their maximum
> and minimum. Instead of slowing down as they reach their limits they
> suddenly stop at the limits.

The brick wall is a feature.  Looks right to me.


> It would be nice to get this stuff configured as the behaviour looks rather
> unsightly ...

For some reason I always find myself a bit unenthusiastic about attending to 
your complaints.  I wonder what the reason could be?


Dave





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to